How to plan my data properties in OpenBOM Bill of Materials and Catalogs

Oleg Shilovitsky
Oleg Shilovitsky
17 July, 2019 | 2 min for reading
How to plan my data properties in OpenBOM Bill of Materials and Catalogs

Even OpenBOM looks and smells like a spreadsheet, inside OpenBOM manages data using multiple databases. The concept of a spreadsheet is applied to OpenBOM user experience. To manage data, you need to define “properties” in OpenBOM. You can think about them as a database field. OpenBOM is flexible allows you to define, change and delete these properties at any time. So, from the beginning.

OpenBOM Bill of Materials and Catalogs are fundamental data structures managed by OpenBOM. One of the questions I’ve often got in support is related to where to create a property – in BOM or in a Catalog. 

In today’s blog and video, I’d like to explain how to decide about where to create a property – in BOM or Catalog. Check the picture below. This is the data model of BOM and Catalogs. 

As you can see catalog properties are describing data that must remain the same for all instances of the part/assembly (Eg. Unit Cost, Description, etc.). At the same time, variable properties are defined in BOMs. 

The following picture can give you a very simplified idea of how it can be done. 

In the following video, I can give you some idea how to make these planning mostly efficient and how to project your concepts into OpenBOM reference-instance model by defined catalog and BOM properties.

Conclusion

Catalog and BOM model in OpenBOM is really simple but allows you to create a very sophisticated data model. Reference-instance model can be used for any type of BOMs, quantity-based, instance BOMs, engineering, production, planning, etc. You can keep data assigned to reference and instances, while BOM supports parent-child relationships. Together BOM and catalogs are a solid foundation of OpenBOM. 

Register to OpenBOM FREE user subscription and experience OpenBOM model tomorrow.

Best, Oleg

PS. Let’s get to know each other better. If you live in the Greater Boston area, I invite you for a coffee together (coffee is on me). If not nearby, let’s have a virtual coffee session — I will figure out how to send you a real coffee.

Want to learn more about PLM? Check out my Beyond PLM blog and PLM Book website

Related Posts

Also on OpenBOM

4 6
19 May, 2026

For years, BOM review was often treated as a procedural step between engineering and release. Teams created bills of materials,...

18 May, 2026

I’m heading to SharePLM Summit 2026 in Jerez de la Frontera, Spain. This is a new conference in my calendar,...

15 May, 2026

Many manufacturing companies using SOLIDWORKS as a mechanical design CAD system start with a relatively simple engineering process. A few...

14 May, 2026

For almost three decades, most PDM and PLM systems followed the same architectural assumptions. A product was represented as a...

13 May, 2026

How modern products require connected data models that combine mechanical, electronic, software, and manufacturing information across the lifecycle. Why Mechanical...

11 May, 2026

Twenty years ago, designing a product mostly meant mechanical design. A mechanical assembly captured most of what needed to be...

8 May, 2026

Earlier this week, I previewed CAD File Agent for SOLIDWORKS. If you missed that, check these two articles: Why did...

7 May, 2026

A new kind of experience for engineers who never wanted a PDM system in the first place We Started with...

5 May, 2026

When I left Autodesk, I had a strong gut feeling about where the industry was headed. CAD vendors, I believed,...

To the top